Conference Call Archive
Archive | January 2010 | December 2009 | October 2009 | August 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | 2009 Face-to-Face | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | 2008 Face-to-Face | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | March 2007 | 2007 Face-to-Face | November 2006 | October 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | 2006 Face-to-Face | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | 2005 Face-to-Face | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | 2004 Face-to-Face
September 2005 Conference Call


September 20, 2005 4-5:15 EDT

Present
: Mary Hall, Carol Hutchins, Mike Mahoney, Rosemary McGuinness, Joe November, Len Shustek, Rick Snodgrass, and David S. Wise

Indented prose is what was discussed; non-indented prose is from the agenda.

  • Status

    • Schedule for this year: (David)

      The budget cycle begins November/December; we should have a budget ready by the end of the year for Fiscal 2007, starting July 2006.

      Beth's work on going through HQ material should start very soon.

      Our next Face-to-Face meeting will be at the Computer History Museum in either December or January.


  • Access to reviews in ManuscriptCentral (Carol)

    Carol is taking a draft policy to the Pubs Board on what material should be retained (everything) and a process for vetting requests.

    A suggestion was made to look at our sister sciences. (For example, the physicists (APS) could in the end not agree on a policy. Our hope is that cooperation between the Pubs Board and the History Committee will yield a better result.)

  • Interactions with the CHM and its Sloan Industry History Project (Rick) Rick had previously sent a summary email.

    The Committee decided to advance on looking into SIGs using the CHM software.

    The Committee decided that Luanne's plan concerning using their system for feedback on ACM sounded good.

  • SGB (Mary and Mike)

    Mary and Mike summarized their experience in Newark on August 13. Joe will put their presentation online. It seemed to go well. Several SIG chairs mentioned that they want to do their own interviews, because they didn't have the funds to pay professional historians. The chairs would appreciate guidance on how to do this. There was less interest in how to run a HOPL-type conference.

  • HOPL III (Mary, Mike)

    Mike was at a PC meeting in Newark last week. Mike gave a talk on "What Makes History?". Drafts of 19 language histories were discussed.

  • History Committee Web Site (Joe)

    The official URL for the committee is now http://www.acm.org/about_acm/acm_history/new_homepage.html

    The old site (http://www.acm.org/about_acm/acm_history/) still exists; Joe is reticent to delete that site until he is sure that he has copied everything of value into the new site.

    All committee members were encouraged to provide comments and content to Joe.

  • CACM special issue

    David is serving as Editor for this special issue, which is scheduled for a May 2007 issue date.

    We brainstormed on possible content.

    • Special issue editorial board will invite articles.

    • A call for papers will also be issued, but most papers will be invited.

    • A retrospective of HOPL I and II is a possibility.

    • Perhaps a few SIGs can tell their story.

    • Interviewers may want to write their own historical analysis using (among other things) the transcript of their commissioned interview (e.g., Tom's interview of Charles Bachman).